

The chin is the quiet architect of the face. It anchors the profile, defines the jawline, and lends the lower face its balance — and when it is underprojected, no amount of work on the nose or cheeks will fully settle the picture. Chin augmentation in Dubai exists to restore that balance, and I approach it differently from most. I am Dr. Nazmi Baycin, and I am the only surgeon in Dubai who designs each chin implant from the patient’s own CT scan — a bespoke, 3D-printed implant shaped to fit your facial bone exactly, rather than a stock implant trimmed to approximate it. That distinction is not cosmetic.
Over twenty-five years and more than four hundred chin augmentations, I have learned that the difference between a natural result and an obvious one lies in fit — an implant that matches the underlying bone to the millimeter sits stably, looks like skeleton rather than addition, and avoids the malposition that drives most complications. Performing chin augmentation in Dubai within JCI-accredited hospitals, I plan every case in three dimensions before I ever make an incision, guided by a single principle: to restore form is to restore function.
| Procedure detail | Chin augmentation in Dubai |
|---|---|
| Technique | 3D CT-designed custom implant (or osteotomy) |
| Implant | Bespoke, printed from your own CT scan |
| Anesthesia | General |
| Procedure time | ~1 hour |
| Hospital stay | Day case (no overnight stay) |
| Incision | Inside the mouth (no external scar) or submental |
| Sutures | Dissolvable (none to remove) |
| Downtime | 1–2 days |
| Jaw garment | 1 week |
| Swelling resolves | 7–10 days |
| Initial result | Visible immediately; refines over weeks |
A well-judged chin augmentation strengthens a weak or receding chin, sharpens the jawline, and brings the lower face into proportion with the nose and cheeks. Seen in profile, it is often the single change that makes everything else look “right” — which is why it pairs so naturally with rhinoplasty in profile work.
The aim is never a larger chin for its own sake; it is harmony, the sense that the feature always belonged. Because the implant I use is designed from your own anatomy, the enhancement reads as your own bone — defined, balanced, and entirely natural from every angle.
The structure, shape, and size of the facial bones differ from person to person, and they shape how the whole face is read. A chin that sits too far back unbalances the profile and can make an otherwise average nose look prominent — the combination sometimes described as “bird-face deformity,” an underdeveloped chin paired with a beak-like nasal profile.
Correcting the profile as a whole is called profiloplasty, and chin augmentation is one of its key components, frequently combined with rhinoplasty to enhance the side view. If you are not sure whether the feature that bothers you is the nose or the chin, I set that question out in my article on why a recessed chin makes an ordinary nose look large. When several features contribute to the imbalance, the chin is best judged as one element of a full facial transformation rather than in isolation. Beyond aesthetics, significant jaw discrepancies can cause functional problems with chewing; in those cases maxillofacial surgery — a branch of plastic surgery — addresses the underlying skeletal relationship.
You are likely a good candidate if you feel your chin is weak or out of proportion with the rest of your face, you are over 18 and in good general health, and your expectations are realistic. A clean medical history matters, because patient safety governs every decision I make before surgery. The best way to know whether an implant — and what shape of implant — suits you is a 3D assessment of your facial bones, which shows us together exactly what a given correction will achieve before anything is decided.
It is worth being clear about what this procedure does not treat. Where the softness under the jaw is fullness rather than a shortfall in bone — a heavy neckline over an adequately projected chin — no implant will correct it, and the answer is removing submental fullness instead. Where the roundness sits higher, in the mid-cheek, the deep cheek fat is responsible and deep cheek fat reduction is the more direct route. The 3D assessment is what separates these cases, because it shows the skeleton beneath the soft tissue.
The chin can be enhanced in two fundamentally different ways: by adding a custom implant in front of the bone, or by cutting and advancing the bone itself (an osteotomy). Both have their place, and the right choice depends on your anatomy and the degree of correction needed.
This technique is more complex and more demanding. I make a 3–4 cm incision on the inner side of the lower lip, lift the soft tissue from the chin bone, and use a powered saw to free a section of bone, which I then move forward to increase projection and fix with screws. Its advantage is that the scar is hidden inside the mouth, with no external mark. Its drawbacks are real: it is intricate and labor-intensive — which is why many surgeons avoid it — and the surgical time is longer than with an implant.
Which of the two your anatomy actually calls for is not a matter of preference but of measurement. I set out the full diagnostic reasoning — and the cephalometric findings that point to one operation rather than the other — in my article on comparison of a chin implant and a sliding genioplasty.

A side-view 3D CT reconstruction of a patient who had a sliding genioplasty elsewhere and came to me asking for a custom chin implant to correct the result. The arrow marks the problem. The section of bone that was cut and moved forward now sits as a separate block below and in front of the mandible, and where the two should meet there is a visible step, a notch in the lower border of the jaw, and an open gap between the base bone and the advanced fragment. This is not a botched operation; it is what the geometry of the technique produces to some degree in every case, because sliding a segment forward leaves the bone behind it where it was. Whether the step shows through the skin depends on how far the segment was moved and how thick the overlying soft tissue is, but on the CT it is always there. Designing an implant from this scan lets me fill the notch and the gap, restore a continuous lower border, and give the chin the projection it needed, without moving the bone a second time.
Moving the bone has consequences that an implant does not. The advanced segment can resorb at its edges as it heals, so some of the projection gained on the operating table is lost over the following year. Because the cut is made by hand and the segment is positioned by eye, a small asymmetry between the two sides is easy to introduce and hard to correct afterward. And there is the step: advancing a section of the mandible leaves a notch in the lower border behind it, which has been reported in up to 72.5% of patients after the sliding osteotomy, and which can produce an hourglass shape from the front and accentuate the jowl in profile. In many patients the soft tissue hides it; in some it does not; on the CT scan it is present in nearly all, as the image above shows.
I want to be fair to the technique, because the comparative literature does not favor implants in every respect. A 2023 cohort of 80 patients found more infections, more wound breakdown, and more reoperations after stock chin implants than after osseous genioplasty, and higher patient satisfaction in the genioplasty group; a 2025 systematic review of 1,126 patients reached a similar conclusion, with the caveat that the implant patients in those studies received off-the-shelf implants and that genioplasty was often reserved for the more complex cases.
My preference for the implant rests on what those studies did not test. The complications that count against implants, malposition, revision, and infection in dead space, are the ones a CT-designed implant is built to close off, and I choose the access route to keep the infection risk low. The drawbacks of the osteotomy, resorption, asymmetry, and the notch in the bone contour, are inherent to cutting and moving bone and do not disappear with better planning.
Implant placement is the most popular and most direct method, and the one I most often recommend because, with a bespoke implant, it is both precise and minimally invasive. The chin bone is reached either from inside the mouth or from just beneath the chin, the implant is positioned against the bone and secured with screws, and the result is immediate and stable.
With a CT-designed implant, the fit is exact — which is the single most important factor in a natural, long-lasting result. If you want to know how closely the finished implant reproduces the plan you approve — and why the preview is a specification rather than a picture — I set that out in my article on chin implant accuracy, from plan to result.
| Factor | 3D custom implant | Osteotomy (sliding genioplasty) |
|---|---|---|
| What is done | A bespoke implant, printed from your CT scan, is placed in front of the chin bone and fixed with screws | A section of the chin bone is cut free with a saw, moved forward, and fixed with plates and screws |
| Invasiveness | Lower; the bone is not cut | Higher; a full-thickness bone cut through the front of the mandible |
| Anesthesia | General | General |
| Surgical time | About 1 hour | Longer; intricate and labor-intensive |
| Incision and scar | Inside the lower lip (no visible scar) or a small submental incision beneath the chin | Inside the lower lip only; no external scar |
| Planning | Every millimeter decided on the 3D model before surgery; nothing to judge on the table | The cut and the amount of advancement are judged by the surgeon during the operation |
| Predictability of the soft-tissue result | Previewed in multi-layer soft-tissue simulation; the plan you approve is a specification | Estimated from cephalometric ratios; the soft-tissue response to bone movement is less predictable |
| Bone contour afterward | Continuous; the implant is feathered into the bone on the model | A step and notch at the lower border behind the advanced segment, visible or not, is inherent to the technique |
| Bone resorption | Minimal with an implant that seats flush; described mainly with poorly fitting stock implants | The advanced segment can resorb at its edges as it heals, losing some projection over the first year |
| Asymmetry | Each side designed independently; an asymmetric bone can be balanced by the implant | Can correct an existing asymmetry, but a hand-positioned segment can also introduce one |
| Vertical and complex changes | Adds projection and width; cannot shorten or lengthen the chin | Can advance, set back, lengthen, shorten, or rotate the chin |
| Nerve numbness | Temporary lower-lip numbness possible from retraction near the mental nerve | More common and can last longer, because the cut passes close to the nerve canal |
| Infection | Higher than the osteotomy in stock-implant series; the custom fit and access route are chosen to lower it | Lower; there is no foreign body |
| Malposition or shifting | The main implant-specific risk with stock implants; addressed by the CT-designed fit and screw fixation | Not applicable, though the segment can relapse slightly during healing |
| Reversibility | The implant can be removed or exchanged | The bone cut is permanent; correction means a second osteotomy or an implant over the defect |
| Recovery | Day case; 1–2 days downtime; jaw garment for 1 week; swelling settles in 7–10 days | Day case or overnight; more swelling; soft diet longer; bone healing continues for weeks |
| Best for | Most projection deficits, and correction of a previous genioplasty | Large or complex skeletal cases, vertical discrepancies, and chins needing setback |
| What the evidence shows | Comparative studies use stock implants, not custom ones. In those, the osteotomy shows fewer infections and reoperations and higher satisfaction, while the implant shows less nerve disturbance, a shorter operation, and reversibility. No trial has compared a CT-designed implant with the osteotomy head to head; my preference for the implant is reasoning about which drawbacks can be designed out and which cannot. | |
When an implant is used, it can be placed through one of two routes. The intraoral approach uses a 3–4 cm incision inside the lower lip, leaving no visible scar — but the mouth’s rich bacterial environment carries a slightly higher infection risk. The submental approach uses a 3–4 cm incision in the skin just beneath the jawline, creating a pocket directly over the bone; it is generally easier and carries a lower infection risk, but it leaves a small scar beneath the chin. I choose between them based on your anatomy, your implant, and which trade-off serves your result best.
Chin augmentation has been transformed by 3D imaging and custom implant printing, and this is the heart of my practice. From an advanced 3D CT scan I build a precise digital model of your facial bones, then design an implant that fits your unique anatomy exactly — not a stock shape adapted in the operating room, but a bespoke implant printed for you.
The result is greater precision, a more natural outcome, fewer complications, and a faster recovery. To understand how 3D CT imaging guides the precise planning of chin surgery, see my 3D CT imaging for facial surgical planning article, and for the full method, 3D technology in chin implant surgery.

A custom implant designed from the patient’s own 3D CT scan.

A multi‑layered 3D analysis demonstrating the predictable soft‑tissue response to customized chin augmentation. The top‑view and side‑view panels sequentially overlay four critical anatomical layers: the native facial bone structure, the precisely adapted chin implant, the pre‑operative soft‑tissue envelope (baseline contour), and the post‑operative soft‑tissue position (simulated outcome). This advanced biomechanical simulation, derived from high‑resolution CT data, allows me to predict exactly how the soft tissues will drape over the underlying implant architecture – eliminating post‑operative surprises and ensuring that the final result aligns flawlessly with the patient’s aesthetic goals. By quantifying soft‑tissue thickness, elasticity, and skeletal support, this digital twin methodology transforms chin augmentation from an art of approximation into an engineering science of certainty, delivering reproducible, natural‑looking results for patients seeking precision chin augmentation in Dubai.
The simulation below is a real patient model. You can select the visualization mode using the button on the left, which allows you to view the model with or without soft tissue and compare before-and-after states. You can also change the viewing angle by moving the mouse by clicking and dragging inside the frame.
Very few chins are perfectly symmetric, and a small difference between the two sides usually goes unnoticed. When one side of the chin is clearly weaker than the other, though, the chin reads as off-center and the lower face looks lopsided, however well the rest of the face is balanced. A stock implant cannot correct this, because it is symmetric by manufacture: it adds the same volume to both sides and carries the imbalance forward. A custom implant is designed on each side separately, so it can add more where the bone is deficient and less where it is not.
In the case shown below, the left side of the chin was relatively weaker than the right. The 3D face scan shows how the imbalance appeared on the surface, and the CT scan confirms it in the bone; in every image the vertical line marks the facial midline. The implant was then designed against that skeleton, with more volume on the weaker left side, so that the chin contour was restored symmetrically about the midline.

The 3D face scan, from the front (left) and from above (right), with the facial midline marked. Before surgery, the left side of the chin was weaker than the right — by Dr. Nazmi Baycin, Dubai.

The same patient’s skull on 3D CT, from the front (left) and from above (right). Measured against the midline, the scan confirms in the bone what the face scan shows on the surface — by Dr. Nazmi Baycin, Dubai.

The custom implant designed on the skull, from the front (left) and from above (right). It carries more volume on the weaker left side, so the chin contour is restored symmetrically about the midline — by Dr. Nazmi Baycin, Dubai.
An implant adds to bone; it cannot move it. It corrects asymmetry in the width and contour of the chin, as in this case. Where the asymmetry is vertical, where the whole jaw is shifted off the midline, or where the bite is involved, the answer is a sliding genioplasty or jaw surgery rather than an implant. And where the imbalance lies in the soft tissue rather than the bone, an implant will not correct it. The 3D scan shows which of these applies before anything is decided. Why a symmetric implant can only cover an asymmetry, and how the two sides are measured on the bone, is the subject of my article on why a chin implant is not a projection problem.
The simulation below is this patient’s model. You can select the visualization mode using the button on the left, which allows you to view the skull, the implant design, and the face before and after surgery. You can also change the viewing angle by clicking and dragging inside the frame.
This is where bespoke design earns its place. The problems specific to implant-based augmentation are malposition, the need for revision, and infection, and each of them has the same root: an implant that does not sit flush against the bone it is meant to extend. A gap between implant and bone is a space the implant can shift within, and a space fluid can collect in. Designing the implant from your own CT scan is how I close that gap before the operation rather than trying to compensate for it during one. How the pocket is dissected and the implant secured is a subject in its own right, which I set out in my article on why the pocket and fixation decide whether a chin implant holds its position. I should be plain that this is reasoning about mechanism: no trial has compared custom-designed implants against stock ones head to head, and I present it as the judgment this whole method rests on rather than as a proven result.
| Factor | Stock (off-the-shelf) implant | CT-designed custom implant |
|---|---|---|
| Design basis | Generic shape manufactured in a handful of fixed sizes | Designed from your own 3D CT scan and printed for your bone alone |
| Fit to the bone | Approximate; the inner surface follows an average chin, not yours | Inner surface is a negative of your bone, matched to the millimeter |
| Adjustment in the operating room | Often trimmed or carved by hand to improve the fit | None needed; the fit is decided before the incision is made |
| Dead space under the implant | Gaps between implant and bone are common wherever contours differ | Eliminated by design; the implant sits flush across its whole footprint |
| Malposition / shifting | A gap is a space the implant can rotate or migrate within | No gap to move within; stability comes from the fit as well as the screws |
| Fluid collection and infection substrate | Dead space can collect fluid, which is a medium for infection | Flush contact leaves no reservoir for fluid to pool in |
| Fixation | Screws placed through an implant that may rock on an uneven bed | Screw positions planned on the model; the implant is fixed against a bed it already matches |
| Facial asymmetry | Symmetric by manufacture; cannot correct a chin bone that is not | Each side designed independently, so an asymmetric bone can be balanced |
| Load on the bone beneath | Poor fit concentrates pressure at contact points, the setting in which underlying bone resorption is described | Load spread evenly across the full contact surface |
| Edge visibility and palpability | Edges may be felt or seen where the implant lifts off the bone | Edges feathered into the bone surface on the model, so the transition is smooth |
| Predictability of the result | Judged from a size chart and the surgeon’s estimate | Previewed in soft-tissue simulation; what you approve is a specification, not a picture |
| Revision likelihood | Revision is most often for malposition or a visible edge, both fit-related | The fit-related causes of revision are addressed in the design stage |
| Lead time | Available immediately | Several weeks for CT scan, design approval, and printing |
| Cost | Lower | Higher, reflecting imaging, design, and manufacture |
| Evidence base | Long track record; the reference against which other methods are judged | No head-to-head trial against stock implants; the advantages above are reasoning about mechanism, not a proven result |
The numbness patients fear after chin surgery comes from one structure: the inferior alveolar nerve, which runs inside the jaw and exits through the mental foramen below the premolars as the mental nerve, supplying feeling to the lower lip and chin. Every published series lists nerve disturbance as the most frequent complication of chin and jaw implants, and the reason is simple: with a stock implant, the surgeon decides where to drill the fixation screws in the operating room, by feel, with the nerve hidden inside the bone. On the CT model the nerve is visible along its whole course. I trace it, design the implant to sit clear of the foramen, and place the screw holes where the bone is safe, so the fixation is decided before the incision rather than improvised through it. What remains after that is the temporary numbness of retraction, which settles; the injury that a misplaced screw can cause is designed out.

Side and front views of a patient’s 3D CT model prepared for chin implant surgery in Dubai. The inferior alveolar nerve is traced in red along its course inside the jaw, emerging at the mental foramen on each side; the teeth are shown in yellow for orientation. The custom implant is seated on the bone exactly as it will be in surgery, and the screw holes, marked in red, are placed where the bone is thick and the nerve is absent, well clear of the foramen. This is planning done on the patient’s own anatomy rather than on an average: the fixation points are chosen on the model, the drill never approaches the nerve, and the risk of permanent numbness that a blind screw can cause is removed before the operation begins.

The image shows a 3D print of the patient’s facial bone structure, which is in a 1:1 ratio with the patient’s real measurements. On the left side, the inner surface of the implant is visible. On the right side, the exact fit of the implant on the bone surface is shown.

The picture shows the implant properly placed on the chin through the submental incision and secured with two screws.
Sometimes the chin alone is not the whole story — balanced, defined lower-face proportions may call for enhancement of the entire jawline. For those patients a 3D custom jawline implant is the more complete solution, restoring harmony across the whole lower face.

Chin projection is only one part of the picture — a lasting result depends on how the chin relates to the jaw angles and the neckline. I explain this whole-face thinking in detail in my article on the structural philosophy of total jawline harmony. You can preview the effect through soft-tissue simulation before deciding, and read the full detail in my guide to 3D customized jawline implant surgery in Dubai.
I perform every chin augmentation in a premium, JCI-accredited hospital in Dubai that meets the highest international standards for safety and hygiene. Your surgery takes place in a fully equipped, advanced medical environment — because outstanding results and uncompromising safety are inseparable.
Chin augmentation is a day procedure — you go home the same day. I provide prescriptions for antibiotics and pain relief; the surgery itself is not especially painful, but the medication keeps the first days comfortable. If your incision is inside the mouth, you will use an antiseptic mouthwash for four to five days and keep to soft foods during that time. You will wear a supportive jaw garment for a week, and any swelling typically settles within seven to ten days. The initial result is visible immediately, refining as the swelling resolves.

Side view of the face before the chin implant surgery

Side view of the face after the chin implant surgery

The scar in the submental region had completely disappeared four months after the surgery.
To understand the full science behind how I support your healing after surgery, visit my advanced recovery protocol in Dubai article.
Download Dr. Baycin’s chin augmentation aftercare instructions
Chin augmentation is unusual among the operations I perform in that the result is there before the recovery begins. You go home the same day with the implant fixed to the bone and a jaw garment holding everything still; for the first day or two the chin feels tight and swollen, and if I have gone in through the mouth you keep to soft foods and an antiseptic rinse. By day three most people are back at a desk, the mouthwash finishes around day five, and the garment comes off at one week. Swelling settles between days seven and ten, the sutures dissolve on their own, and over weeks three and four the contour refines as the tissues seat onto the implant. The mood runs behind the body: the first days feel like a lot for a small operation, then the profile appears from under the swelling, and by the end of the month the chin simply reads as yours. The pace varies with personality; the shape rarely does.
Enter the surgery date you planned and view your own recovery calendar; then add it to your phone calendar or print it.
Your timeline appears here once you choose a date.
These are typical timings. Your own plan depends on your health, the technique used, and how you heal; always follow the instructions Dr. Baycin gives you after surgery. Nothing you enter here is sent or stored.
Chin augmentation is a safe procedure in experienced hands, but no operation is without risk. The recognized risks include infection, hematoma, temporary numbness of the lower lip or chin from irritation of the mental nerve, asymmetry, and — specific to implants — malposition or shifting that can require revision.
There is a trade-off worth stating plainly: implant-based augmentation carries a higher rate of infection and wound breakdown than techniques that move the bone instead, and the risk varies markedly with the surgical route used.
This is precisely why I design each implant from your own CT scan and choose the access route case by case. An implant that seats exactly on the bone leaves no dead space to shift within or to harbor infection, which is my rationale for the bespoke approach — reasoning about mechanism rather than a result proven head to head. Careful patient selection, sterile technique, and the right surgical route for each patient reduce the remaining risks to a low level, and where any issue arises it is almost always correctable.
Important: This checklist helps you prepare for your consultation. It cannot decide whether surgery is safe or suitable for you. Please disclose your full medical history, medicines, and supplements when we meet — everything you share stays confidential.
| # | Question | Why it matters | If the answer is “NO” |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Are you 18 or older, with facial growth complete? | An implant is fixed to the jaw bone, which must have finished growing. | Not offered |
| 2 | In profile, does your chin look weak or set back, making your nose or lower face look out of balance? | Chin augmentation adds projection where the bone falls short. Softness from fat is treated differently. | Alternative advised Under the jaw: double chin correction; in the mid-cheek: buccal fat removal. |
| 3 | Do your upper and lower teeth meet normally, without a significant jaw misalignment? | An implant adds to the bone but cannot correct the bite; a major jaw discrepancy needs a different operation. | Alternative advised Jaw (orthognathic) surgery may be assessed instead. |
| 4 | Are you open to the method — custom implant or bone advancement — being chosen from a 3D CT scan of your face? | The scan shows which correction your anatomy needs and previews the result before anything is decided. | Discuss at consultation |
| 5 | Can you allow several weeks before surgery for the scan, design approval, and implant manufacture? | A custom implant is designed and printed for you alone. | Discuss at consultation If an osteotomy is chosen, there is no implant to wait for. |
| # | Does this apply to you? | Why it matters | Usual next step |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medical history | |||
| 6 | Heart disease, high blood pressure, or an irregular heartbeat | General anesthesia and surgery add strain on the heart. | Medical review |
| 7 | A previous blood clot (DVT or PE), a clotting disorder, or a close relative with clots | Surgery raises clot risk; prevention is planned around your personal risk. | Medical review |
| 8 | Diabetes | Blood-sugar control affects healing and infection risk around the implant. | Medical review |
| 9 | Asthma, other lung disease, or sleep apnea | These affect breathing during and after anesthesia. | Medical review |
| 10 | Liver or kidney disease, anemia, or a bleeding disorder | These affect how medicines are cleared, bleeding, and recovery. | Medical review |
| 11 | HIV, hepatitis B or C, or another blood-borne infection | Well-controlled infection does not automatically rule surgery out; your team plans around it. | Discuss at consultation In confidence. |
| 12 | Past problems with anesthesia, or allergy to local anesthetics, antibiotics, or latex | Chin augmentation is performed under general anesthesia. | Medical review |
| 13 | Previous chin or jaw surgery, an existing implant, or fillers in the chin or jawline | Earlier work changes the bone and soft tissue the implant is designed against. | Medical review The 3D CT scan maps it. |
| 14 | Numbness of the lower lip or chin, or a previous nerve injury in the jaw | The nerve that gives the lip and chin feeling exits right beside the implant area; the baseline is recorded. | Medical review |
| 15 | Medicines for bone thinning (such as bisphosphonates or denosumab), or past radiation to the jaw | These affect jaw-bone healing around fixation screws. | Medical review |
| 16 | A dental infection, gum disease, loose lower front teeth, or dental work planned soon | The implant may be placed through the mouth, which must be healthy to avoid infection. | Postpone Until treated; plan dental work around surgery. |
| 17 | Braces or orthodontic treatment planned or under way | Moving teeth changes the lip and chin position the implant is designed for. | Discuss at consultation |
| 18 | Jaw joint pain, clicking, or limited mouth opening | Recovery involves a jaw garment and soft foods, and the mouth route needs good opening. | Discuss at consultation |
| 19 | A rash, acne flare, or infection on the chin or under the jaw | The implant may be placed through a small incision under the chin. | Postpone Until treated and settled. |
| 20 | A history of keloid or thick, raised scars | Relevant if the incision is placed under the chin. | Discuss at consultation |
| 21 | Pregnant, breastfeeding, or possibly pregnant | Planning needs a CT scan, and elective surgery is deferred until after pregnancy and breastfeeding. | Postpone |
| Medicines and supplements | |||
| 22 | Blood thinners, aspirin, or anti-inflammatories such as ibuprofen | These increase bleeding; some are paused before surgery under medical guidance. | Medical review Never stop a prescribed medicine on your own. |
| 23 | Supplements such as fish oil, vitamin E, ginkgo, garlic, or turmeric | Several raise bleeding risk and are usually paused before surgery. | Discuss at consultation |
| 24 | Weight-loss injections such as semaglutide or tirzepatide | They slow stomach emptying, which matters for anesthesia, and mean your weight may still be changing. | Medical review |
| 25 | The contraceptive pill, hormone therapy, or prescribed testosterone | Estrogen raises clot risk; testosterone can thicken the blood. | Medical review |
| 26 | Anabolic steroids or other performance-enhancing drugs | These affect the heart, liver, blood count, and anesthesia. | Medical review Please be open with us — it stays confidential. |
| 27 | Antidepressants or other psychiatric medication | Some interact with anesthesia or pain medicines. | Medical review Keep taking them unless your prescriber advises otherwise. |
| Lifestyle and travel | |||
| 28 | Smoking, vaping, or any nicotine — including pouches, gum, or patches | Nicotine slows healing and raises infection risk around the implant, especially when it is placed through the mouth. | Discuss at consultation Nicotine-free recovery period is advised. |
| 29 | Recreational drug use or regular heavy drinking | These interact with anesthesia and slow healing. | Medical review |
| 30 | Flying long-haul to Dubai for surgery, or planning to fly home soon after | Long flights add to clot risk around surgery. | Discuss at consultation We plan your travel dates with you. |
| Expectations and wellbeing | |||
| 31 | Do you spend a lot of time worrying about how your face looks, or feel no change would be enough even when others disagree? | This can be a sign of body-image distress that surgery rarely relieves. | Discuss at consultation A supportive, private conversation. |
Medical note: A medical condition, infection, or medicine does not automatically rule out chin augmentation. The decision depends on the diagnosis, how well it is controlled, the planned procedure, and assessment by the surgeon and anesthesia team. Never stop or change prescribed medication without advice from your treating clinician.
Chin augmentation risks: These include infection, hematoma, temporary numbness of the lower lip or chin, asymmetry, and — with implants — shifting that may need revision. Implant-based augmentation carries a higher infection rate than moving the bone, and the risk varies with the route used. These are discussed in full at consultation.
Aesthetic note: Chin augmentation improves chin projection and facial balance with a custom implant or, where the anatomy calls for it, a bone advancement. It does not correct the bite or fat beneath the jaw, and a significant jaw discrepancy may need a different operation. Results vary, and this checklist cannot guarantee a particular result.
Checklist medically reviewed by Dr. Nazmi Baycin, DHA-licensed plastic surgeon · Checklist last updated: 21.10.2026
Because chin augmentation is performed under general anesthesia, and because your implant is made for you alone, the path from your first visit to your procedure follows six steps. Each one is there to confirm that surgery is both safe and right for you.
Chin augmentation prices in Dubai can really differ from one clinic to another, influenced by a variety of factors such as surgeon’s experience, implant design technology, and ranges from about 20,000 AED ($5,500) to 80,000 AED ($22,000). Keep in mind that these figures don’t represent Dr. Baycin’s specific rates; you’ll get the exact price during your consultation after he evaluates your situation.
For a complete overview of treatment fees, please refer to full price list of the procedures. If you are looking specifically for this procedure, you can also review pricing information.
Schedule your private consultation with Dr. BaycinWith more than four hundred successful chin augmentations, I have set a benchmark in Dubai for precision and aesthetic balance — and the reason patients travel to me is simple: the implant is designed for their face, not adapted to it.

Written and medically reviewed by
DHA-licensed, board-certified plastic surgeon, Dubai
Surgery, to me, is precision applied in service of restoration — a conviction that has guided every one of the more than 7,000 procedures I have performed over 25 years in practice. I am a DHA-licensed, board-certified plastic surgeon, trained in Turkey and based in Dubai since 2016. I operate exclusively within JCI-accredited hospitals, and hold international membership in the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS). Three techniques, in particular, have become signatures of my practice. Scarless breast augmentation, performed through a transaxillary approach that leaves no incision on the breast itself. Labiaplasty designed individually around each patient’s own anatomy, never to a standard template. And 3D customized facial bone implants, engineered through CT-based bespoke printing — a technique I currently offer as the only surgeon in Dubai providing it. My practice today spans facial rejuvenation, breast surgery, body contouring, and cosmetic genital procedures, drawing patients from across the UAE, Europe, and the wider GCC. Yet the principle guiding each of these specialties has never changed: to restore form is to restore function.
Chin augmentation is how I strengthen a weak or receding chin to restore balance to the face, sharpen the jawline, and bring the lower face into proportion with the nose and cheeks. The chin is the quiet architect of the face, anchoring the profile, so correcting it often makes everything else look right. I perform it using a CT-designed 3D custom implant shaped to fit your exact facial bone, so the enhancement reads as your own skeleton rather than an addition.
It is chin augmentation using an implant I design from your own CT scan and have 3D-printed to fit your bone precisely, and I am the only surgeon in Dubai offering it. From an advanced 3D CT scan I build a digital model of your facial bones, then design an implant for your unique anatomy rather than trimming a stock shape in the operating room. The exact fit improves the aesthetic result and is designed to lower the malposition, revision, and infection risks seen with stock implants.
Chin augmentation prices in Dubai can really differ from one clinic to another, influenced by a variety of factors, and range from about AED 20,000 to AED 80,000. These figures are general market rates, not Dr. Baycin’s specific pricing; you’ll get the exact price at your consultation, after your situation is evaluated.
The chin can be enhanced in two fundamentally different ways: by adding a custom implant in front of the bone, or by cutting and advancing the bone itself in an osteotomy. I most often recommend the bespoke implant because, with a CT-designed fit, it is both precise and minimally invasive, and the result is immediate and stable. An osteotomy, or sliding genioplasty, is more complex and demanding, and I reserve it for larger or more complex skeletal cases where advancing the bone is the better correction.
Usually not. When I place the implant through the inside of the mouth, using an incision in the lower lip, there is no external scar at all. The alternative submental route uses a small incision beneath the jawline, which leaves a discreet scar that fades over time; in one of my patients it had completely disappeared four months after surgery. I choose between the two routes based on your anatomy, your implant, and which trade-off serves your result best.
In experienced hands it is very safe, though no operation is without risk. The recognized risks include infection, hematoma, temporary numbness of the lower lip or chin, asymmetry, and, specific to implants, malposition or shifting. There is a trade-off worth stating plainly: implants carry a higher rate of infection and wound breakdown than techniques that move the bone instead, and the risk varies markedly with the surgical route used. This is why I design each implant from your own CT scan and choose the access route case by case, so the implant seats exactly on the bone with no dead space to shift within.
Chin augmentation is a day procedure, so you go home the same day, with just one to two days of downtime. I provide antibiotics and pain relief; the surgery itself is not especially painful, but the medication keeps the first days comfortable. If your incision is inside the mouth, you’ll use an antiseptic mouthwash and keep to soft foods for four to five days. You’ll wear a supportive jaw garment for a week, and swelling settles within seven to ten days. The initial result is visible immediately.
This is the heart of my practice. From an advanced 3D CT scan I build a precise digital model of your facial bones, then design an implant that fits your unique anatomy exactly, printed for you rather than adapted in the operating room. I plan every case in three dimensions before I ever make an incision. The result is greater precision, a more natural outcome, fewer complications, and a faster recovery, because the technology addresses the failure modes that make an implant shift or become infected in the first place.
Yes, and it often is. Correcting the profile as a whole is called profiloplasty, and chin augmentation is one of its key components, frequently combined with rhinoplasty to enhance the side view. It is particularly effective for a recessed chin paired with a prominent nose, the combination sometimes described as bird-face deformity, where correcting both together settles the whole profile far better than treating either feature alone.
Yes. Sometimes the chin alone is not the whole story, and balanced, defined lower-face proportions call for enhancement of the entire jawline. For those patients I design a 3D custom jawline implant, a more complete solution that restores harmony across the whole lower face. You can preview the effect through soft-tissue simulation before deciding, which lets us agree on the result together before anything is finalized.
You are likely a good candidate if you feel your chin is weak or out of proportion with the rest of your face, you are over 18 and in good general health, and your expectations are realistic. A clean medical history matters, because patient safety governs every decision I make before surgery. The best way to know whether an implant suits you, and what shape of implant, is a 3D assessment of your facial bones, which shows us together exactly what a given correction will achieve before anything is decided.
The problems specific to implant-based augmentation are malposition, the need for revision, and infection, and each of them has the same root: an implant that does not sit flush against the bone it is meant to extend. A gap between implant and bone is a space the implant can shift within, and a space fluid can collect in. A CT-designed implant is built to seat precisely on your bone, which closes that gap before the operation rather than compensating for it during one. I should be plain that this is reasoning about mechanism rather than a finding proven head to head, and it is why I plan every case in three dimensions before I operate.
Yes, when the asymmetry lies in the width and contour of the chin, and only with a custom implant. A stock implant is symmetric by manufacture, so it adds the same volume to both sides and carries the imbalance forward. A custom implant is designed on each side separately from your CT scan, adding more volume where the bone is deficient and less where it is not, so the chin contour is restored symmetrically about the facial midline. An implant cannot move bone, however. Where the asymmetry is vertical, where the whole jaw is shifted, or where the bite is involved, a sliding genioplasty or jaw surgery is the better answer, and the 3D scan shows which applies.
Get ready to look and feel best… You deserve…
