Dr. Nazmi Baycin, DHA-licensed board-certified plastic surgeon in Dubai

Women who come to me in Dubai wanting their implants out have usually been told, somewhere on the internet, that there is only one right operation. They arrive asking for it by name. What they are rarely told is that the surgical societies I belong to have examined that claim, and found it does not hold.

Let me say the important thing first, as I do to every explant patient in Dubai. If you have systemic symptoms you attribute to your implants — fatigue, aching joints, brain fog — those symptoms are real, and you deserve to be taken seriously rather than managed. Most women do feel better after explantation. What the evidence does not support is the claim that how much scar capsule I remove determines whether you improve. This article explains what the research actually shows, what the four capsule operations really are, and why I will not sell you a bigger one than your tissue requires.

Key takeaways: what explantation can promise

  • Around 82% of women improve after implants are removed.
  • Symptoms fall by roughly half on average, not always to nothing.
  • The type of capsulectomy made no difference to symptom relief.
  • Symptoms fell 74% with no capsule removed at all.
  • En bloc is a cancer operation — its only indication is implant-associated cancer.
  • Capsule is removed when the capsule itself is the problem.

A note on scope: this article is about removing implants and what happens to the capsule. Correcting a poor result while keeping implants — malposition, rippling, asymmetry — is a different operation, which I cover in my article on breast augmentation revision.

Four operations, and why their names matter

Every implant forms a capsule — a thin shell of scar tissue that the body builds around any foreign object. It is normal, and usually harmless. Removing an implant raises the question of what to do with it, and there are four distinct answers, defined formally by a consensus of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, The Aesthetic Society, and the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

  • Partial capsulectomy: some capsule is removed, some deliberately left behind.
  • Total capsulectomy: the whole capsule is removed, though not necessarily in one piece.
  • Total intact capsulectomy: the capsule is removed whole, as a single unit, with the implant inside it.
  • En bloc capsulectomy: the capsule removed together with a margin of surrounding healthy tissue.

That last definition is the one patients are rarely given. A margin of healthy tissue is what a surgeon takes when removing a cancer. The consensus statement is explicit: the absolute and only indication for an en bloc capsulectomy is an established or suspected breast implant-associated cancer, following proper medical workup. The Aesthetic Society adds that the term should not be used at all for a capsulectomy performed in the absence of malignancy.

So when you read that a surgeon performs en bloc removal for implant illness, you are reading a cancer operation’s name applied to something else. I do not use the term that way, and I would gently suggest you ask any surgeon who does what they mean by it.

Diagram titled what explantation can honestly promise, stating that your symptoms are real and that the evidence says how much capsule is removed does not change the outcome. A section titled four operations, one of which is not for you, defines each. Partial capsulectomy: some of the scar capsule is removed and some is deliberately left behind, often sufficient. Total capsulectomy: the whole capsule is removed though not necessarily in one piece, the usual choice when capsule must go. Total intact capsulectomy: the capsule is removed whole as a single unit with the implant inside it, requiring a longer incision and carrying higher risk, sometimes chosen. En bloc capsulectomy: the capsule removed with a margin of healthy tissue around it, a cancer operation, for confirmed or suspected implant cancer only. A panel headed why the last name matters explains that the surgical societies state en bloc is an oncological term whose only indication is a confirmed or suspected implant-associated cancer, and that used outside that setting it describes a bigger operation with a borrowed name. A section titled what the studies found about symptom relief shows three figures. Ninety-six percent improved after removal, and it made no statistical difference whether the capsule came out whole, partly, or not at all. Seventy-four percent had fewer symptoms at six months among patients who had the implant taken out and no capsule removed at all. Eighty-two percent improved across all studies, pooling more than a thousand women, with symptoms falling by about half rather than always to nothing. A section titled when I do remove the capsule and why contrasts reasons rooted in the tissue, namely a thick calcified or contracted capsule, silicone that has escaped a ruptured implant, and any suspicion of implant-associated cancer, noting that here the capsule itself is the problem; against reasons rooted in fear, namely because a bigger operation sounds thorough, because the internet insists upon it, and because a surgeon offers it without indication, noting this means a longer incision and higher risk for no gain. A closing panel titled the honest promise states that most women feel better after their implants come out, symptoms fall by roughly half on average, and not everyone recovers completely; that no surgeon can guarantee resolution and none can honestly claim that removing more capsule will make you better than removing less; and that what can be done is to take you seriously and operate no more than necessary. The final line reads the right operation is the smallest one your tissue requires.

The four capsulectomy definitions and what the evidence shows about symptom relief, by Dr. Nazmi Baycin, Dubai.

What the research actually found

This question has been studied properly, and the answer is unusually clear. A prospective study funded by the Aesthetic Surgery Education and Research Foundation set out specifically to test whether the type of capsulectomy alters symptom improvement in women self-reporting implant illness. The overwhelming majority of them improved after explantation. And intact total, total, and partial capsulectomy all produced similar improvement, with no statistical difference between them.

A later study went further. A prospective cohort in which the implant was removed and no capsule was taken at all found a seventy-four percent reduction in self-reported symptoms at six months — not statistically different from partial or total capsulectomy. Symptom improvement, the authors concluded, is independent of whether capsule remains in the pocket.

And the broader picture is encouraging without being triumphant. A systematic review and meta-analysis of thirty-three studies covering more than six thousand women found that of 1,073 patients explanted for systemic symptoms, 81.9% reported improvement, with symptoms falling on average by about 55 percent. Four women in five feel better. Most do not become symptom-free.

Why I will not offer you the bigger operation

The same research notes something that rarely appears in the marketing: removing the implant and capsule together as one unit requires a longer incision and carries higher risk than a total, partial, or no capsulectomy. It is a bigger operation, closer to the chest wall, with more that can go wrong.

Set those two findings side by side and the conclusion follows. A larger operation, with more risk, producing no measurable additional benefit, is not a superior technique. It is simply more surgery. The American Society of Plastic Surgeons has been unusually blunt about why it is nevertheless offered, warning that some surgeons capitalize on a patient’s trust or fear to urge them toward the costlier and riskier procedure.

I have no interest in being one of them. If you come to my practice in Dubai frightened, I will not sell you reassurance in the form of a scalpel.

Question What patients are often told What the evidence shows My practice
Best operation for BII En bloc is the gold standard Only indicated for implant cancer Reserve the term for cancer
Capsule removal More removal, more relief No difference by capsulectomy type Remove what tissue requires
No capsulectomy Symptoms will persist 74% symptom reduction, none removed Often sufficient
Outcome Symptoms will resolve 82% improve, roughly half reduction Promise honesty, not cure

When the capsule genuinely must come out

None of this means the capsule is always left alone. There are sound, tissue-based reasons to remove it, and in those situations I remove it thoroughly — because the capsule itself is the problem, not because a larger operation feels more decisive.

  • Capsular contracture: a capsule that has thickened, calcified, and contracted around the implant, distorting the breast and causing pain.
  • Implant rupture with silicone in the capsule: where free silicone has escaped the shell and lodged in the surrounding scar tissue.
  • Any suspicion of implant-associated cancer: the one circumstance in which en bloc resection is the correct operation, performed after proper workup.

For a silent rupture of a modern cohesive implant, contained entirely within an unremarkable capsule, a total capsulectomy is not automatically required. I decide by what I find, and I tell patients beforehand that I may find less than they feared.

What your breasts will look like afterward

This deserves candor, because it is what women worry about privately. Skin that has been stretched around an implant for a decade does not spring back. After removal, the breast is often smaller than it was before augmentation, and it may sag.

A mastopexy performed at the same time can reshape the remaining breast tissue and lift the nipple, and for many patients it transforms the outcome. Where volume loss is marked, fat grafting can restore modest fullness using the patient’s own tissue. Neither promises the breast you had at twenty. Both are described on my page about breast lift surgery in Dubai.

Being taken seriously

There is a particular indignity in being unwell and disbelieved. Many women arrive having been told their symptoms are imagined, then find, online, a community that believes them and a surgeon who offers a definitive-sounding operation. I understand entirely why that combination is compelling.

But believing you does not require me to overstate what surgery can do. Your symptoms are real. Explantation helps most women. The capsule surgery is chosen on what I find in your tissue, not on what will sound most thorough. That is the standard I hold as a board-certified cosmetic surgeon in Dubai, and it is the only version of this operation I am willing to offer.

FAQs about breast implant removal in Dubai

  1. Do I need an en bloc capsulectomy?

    Almost certainly not, and I want to explain why carefully. En bloc means removing the capsule together with a margin of surrounding healthy tissue, which is what a surgeon does when removing a cancer. A consensus of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, The Aesthetic Society and ISAPS states that its absolute and only indication is an established or suspected breast implant-associated cancer, after proper workup. So unless cancer is suspected, en bloc is the wrong name for the operation you are being offered. I reserve the term, and the procedure, for the situation it was designed for.

  2. Will removing more capsule improve my symptoms more?

    The evidence says no, and this has been tested directly. A prospective study funded by the Aesthetic Surgery Education and Research Foundation found that the overwhelming majority of women improved after explantation. Crucially, intact total, total and partial capsulectomy all produced similar improvement, with no statistical difference between them. A later study found a 74% reduction in symptoms in women who had no capsule removed at all. So I cannot honestly tell you that taking out more capsule will make you better. What I can tell you is that most women improve after the implants come out.

  3. Are my symptoms real?

    Yes. I want to be unambiguous about that, because so many women arrive having been disbelieved. The researchers who conducted these studies say the same thing: these patients have real symptoms, they are not hypochondriacs. What remains uncertain is the mechanism, not the experience. So you will not be managed or dismissed here. You will be examined, listened to, and given an honest account of what surgery can and cannot do for you.

  4. What are the chances I feel better?

    Good, though not certain. A systematic review of thirty-three studies covering more than six thousand women found that among those explanted for systemic symptoms, about 82% reported improvement. The average reduction was around 55% of symptoms. So four women in five feel better, and most do not become entirely symptom-free. So I would describe the honest expectation as substantial improvement rather than cure. Anyone promising you resolution is promising something the literature does not support.

  5. When do you remove the capsule?

    When the capsule itself is the problem. That means a thick, calcified or contracted capsule distorting the breast and causing pain; an implant rupture where silicone has escaped into the surrounding scar tissue; or any suspicion of implant-associated cancer. In those situations I remove it thoroughly, because there is a tissue-based reason to. So the decision is made on what I find, not on what sounds most decisive. For a silent rupture contained within an unremarkable capsule, full capsulectomy is not automatically required.

  6. Is a bigger capsulectomy safer or riskier?

    Riskier. Removing the implant and capsule together as a single unit requires a longer incision and carries higher risks than a total, partial, or no capsulectomy. The capsule lies against the chest wall, and dissecting all of it away as one piece brings more that can go wrong, particularly with implants placed under the muscle. So a larger operation with more risk and no measurable additional benefit is not a superior technique. It is simply more surgery, and I would need a reason in your tissue to justify it.

  7. Will my breasts sag after removal?

    Often, and I would rather tell you plainly beforehand. Skin stretched around an implant for a decade does not spring back, so the breast is frequently smaller than before augmentation, and it may descend. A breast lift performed at the same time reshapes the remaining tissue and repositions the nipple, and for many patients it transforms the result. Fat grafting can restore modest fullness where volume loss is marked. So the aesthetic outcome is discussed in the same consultation as the removal. Neither procedure returns the breast you had at twenty, and I will not suggest otherwise.

  8. Should I just leave my implants alone?

    If you have no symptoms and no complications, there is currently no recommendation to remove implants purely because you have them. That is worth knowing, because anxiety alone drives some women toward surgery. But implants are not lifetime devices, and remaining alert to changes in the look or feel of your breasts is sensible. So the decision is yours, made with accurate information rather than fear. If you are troubled by symptoms, come and discuss it. If you are troubled only by what you have read, let us talk before anyone reaches for a scalpel.



GET APPOINTMENT

Get ready to look and feel best… You deserve…

Contact Dr. Nazmi Baycin's Dubai clinic for a private consultation
Click For Instant Contact or Send Message

    Go To Top
    About Dr. Nazmi Baycin

    Surgery, to me, is precision applied in service of restoration — a conviction that has guided every one of the more than 7,000 procedures I have performed over 25 years in practice. I am a DHA-licensed, board-certified plastic surgeon, trained in Turkey and based in Dubai since 2016. I operate exclusively within JCI-accredited hospitals, and hold international membership in the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS). Three techniques, in particular, have become signatures of my practice. Scarless breast augmentation, performed through a transaxillary approach that leaves no incision on the breast itself. Labiaplasty designed individually around each patient's own anatomy, never to a standard template. And 3D customised facial bone implants, engineered through CT-based bespoke printing — a technique I currently offer as the only surgeon in Dubai providing it. My practice today spans facial rejuvenation, breast surgery, body contouring, and cosmetic genital procedures, drawing patients from across the UAE, Europe, and the wider GCC. Yet the principle guiding each of these specialties has never changed: to restore form is to restore function. Read Dr. Baycin's full profile

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    error: Content is protected !!